Monday, July 30, 2007
masterpeices at the hisrhorn exhibit?
that's a problem.they ain't masterpeices.they ain't cabbage.they ain't bookshelves.they ain't cows.it's too big a show.it's the whole floor and many of the photographs are the same.it's redundant,not too bright,uninspiring,strong currents of mediocrity and the usual hagiography of junkies and other sentiment which are closer to the garbage can then the cathedral of notre dame.why do they always say masterpeices about this stuff?in general it lacks a decent sense of composition and subject.those things are deemed masterpeices these days.how tough is it to arrange things?julian schnabel was the worst art exhibit i've ever seen including highschoolers.how'd it get to a gallery much less a museum?it was empty,hollow,totally without talent and not the minimal sense of even decoration.i also saw the rare serra drawing at irvine gallery.it was a white rectangle.it wasn't anything else.it was a dumb rectangle.it was bad.no meaning.no art. no free cups of coffee for that.the hirshorn exhibt is still lifes.they don't move.like all the masterpeices it seems to avoid any sense of decency, conscience and has a somewhat close resemblance to the criminal.not the nice criminals.not robin hood or jesse james.just jerks.anti-social without trying to change things and small minded.self-absorbed and corrupt.i've worked for bosnia for years and haven't seen them at a meeting or heard of them.bono thought it was a salute to him.the sarajevans were clearly and purposely driven to suicide and they ain't a help.how many contacted haris siladzjic?i did.by the way, he might stop by your place if you e-mail him.